Restitution for labour expended or money spent when the council has been unable to meet needs

Staffordshire’s proposed 30% cut on a revision exercise exposed as without justification whilst blamed on the RAS; and failure to apply regular increases in the DP rate to the package was ‘fault’

Decision Date:   15 May 2024 Summary: A mother complained about the way Staffordshire approached reviewing her daughter’s care with a suggested cut, and respite entitlement. Direct payments were paid at the wrong rate, for years. After the mother complained, the council raised removing the permission for family members to provide paid care and suggested another […]

Staffordshire’s proposed 30% cut on a revision exercise exposed as without justification whilst blamed on the RAS; and failure to apply regular increases in the DP rate to the package was ‘fault’ Read More »

Haringey Council at fault for delaying a funding panel’s decision several months after a man’s capital was known to have depleted, before organising a care home contract

Decision Date: 16 May 2024 Summary: Haringey Council’s ASC panel took several months to consider a man’s application for care commissioning, which meant he continued paying the full private cost of his own care for longer than he needed to. The council was persuaded to make separate remedy payments to Mr B’s estate and to

Haringey Council at fault for delaying a funding panel’s decision several months after a man’s capital was known to have depleted, before organising a care home contract Read More »

Delay

Delay in assessment and provision decision-making, and in actual provision of a service thereafter, is a constant concern to authorities. It can happen by reason of inadequate resources, on a corporate-wide or a departmental basis, or because of lack of staff time or money, (and staff shortages can have more to do with the general

Delay Read More »

Sandford v London Borough of Waltham Forest [2008] EWHC 1106 QB

This case was brought by the executors of L (S) against the London Borough of Waltham Forest for failing to supply cot-sides to her bed as recommended by an occupational therapist instructed by the council to assess her needs on its behalf as part of its duty under s47(1) National Health Service and Community Care

Sandford v London Borough of Waltham Forest [2008] EWHC 1106 QB Read More »