The legal position regarding carers’ decisions to withdraw or reduce informal care provision

Carers’ Rights under the Care Act

The Care Act 2014 introduced rights and duties for individuals providing or intending to provide care to an adult.  A carer for this purpose is someone who provides unpaid care and support to another person. This is not the same as someone who provides care professionally, or through a voluntary organisation. This section relates to […]

Carers’ Rights under the Care Act Read More »

I have an existing care package via direct payments and require a substantial amount of day and night care, and to better meet my needs and keep costs down, my local council have agreed to pay my cohabiting sibling to provide the majority of my care. However, the council now claims that they do not have to pay for any night care provided by my sibling, despite this being an assessed need and knowing I require a minimum of four interventions during the night. My sibling has made it clear they are not able to provide night time care unpaid, but this is being ignored by the council. Is this lawful practice?

This is more of a matter suited to a referral, because important facets of this problem may make a big difference. The answer on the facts provided is that if you need active intervention at night that would involve someone who is not sleeping in the same bed as yourself, to get up and deal

I have an existing care package via direct payments and require a substantial amount of day and night care, and to better meet my needs and keep costs down, my local council have agreed to pay my cohabiting sibling to provide the majority of my care. However, the council now claims that they do not have to pay for any night care provided by my sibling, despite this being an assessed need and knowing I require a minimum of four interventions during the night. My sibling has made it clear they are not able to provide night time care unpaid, but this is being ignored by the council. Is this lawful practice? Read More »

Can a local authority force a carer to continue providing care after they have said they will not or cannot carry on providing that care?

There is no legal duty on anyone in England to care for another person. So the answer is no, not if a carer can show they have CLEARLY told the local authority or relevant funder that they are not willing or not able to do so. Ignoring the carer’s stance or withdrawal would be a

Can a local authority force a carer to continue providing care after they have said they will not or cannot carry on providing that care? Read More »

Ali Raja & Anor, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Redbridge (Rev 1) [2020] EWHC 1456 (Admin) (05 June 2020)

What Happened This case involved two adult men (A and B), aged 25 and 32, with severe physical and learning disabilities who lived with their mother (X). A and B had extensive night time care needs. They needed to be repositioned numerous times to avoid pressure damage, and it was assessed in a 2017 care

Ali Raja & Anor, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Redbridge (Rev 1) [2020] EWHC 1456 (Admin) (05 June 2020) Read More »

Re S (hospital patient: court’s jurisdiction) [1995] 3 All ER 290 (CA)

Declaration – jurisdiction – legal standing The mistress of an incapacitated Norwegian stroke victim, living in the UK, sought and obtained an injunction preventing his wife and son removing him from hospital and taking him back to Norway to be cared for. She then sought a declaration that it would be unlawful to remove him

Re S (hospital patient: court’s jurisdiction) [1995] 3 All ER 290 (CA) Read More »

P (by his mother and litigation friend MP) v London Borough of Hackney [2007] EWHC 1365 (Admin)

P was a 12 year old boy with autism living with his mother MP who was his litigation friend in this application for judicial review.  The proceedings challenged the adequacy of various assessments made by his local authority LB Hackney.  Central to this dispute was the issue of whether P should be placed in a

P (by his mother and litigation friend MP) v London Borough of Hackney [2007] EWHC 1365 (Admin) Read More »

Ombudsman’s findings against Birmingham City Council (reference number 13 010 519)

The facts Miss P contacted the Council in October 2012 and informed them that she was worried by her son’s (‘J’) unpredictable and violent outbursts, and requested help from Birmingham City Council (‘the Council’). The Council’s records stated that an initial assessment of J’s needs should have been carried out. Social Worker A then visited

Ombudsman’s findings against Birmingham City Council (reference number 13 010 519) Read More »