| In so far as this is a question at all, regarding a discretionary evaluation that is in the hands of the financial assessor, subject only to the regulations regarding DRE and the Guidance, CASCAIDr thinks that a loose assumption will be made that the individual is only liable for a share of the bill, according to an equal split based on the number of occupants, so it is not going to be easy to challenge as unreasonable that their SHARE of the cost that should be discounted from their means is only THAT share, rather than their actual proportionate benefiting from it or need for it. If the person was in fact paying one half of a bill generated by three people, because of their greater use of it, they would be able to show that that was the fact and insist on the council addressing the evidence that that was what was actually in payment. This is not to say that assumptions about heating costs are not challengeable; the guidance from NAFAO about them and how average costs should be calculated is regarded as well overdue for reconsideration. |
