Intro to Ombudsman reports RE Providers’ ‘Fault’

Derbyshire County Council responsible for faults in care assessment and personal budget setting for a direct payment after a revision

Date of decision: 08 April 2026 Summary Derbyshire Council was at fault for delays and inconsistencies in assessing and re-assessing an elderly woman’s care needs, for producing inconsistent personal budgets and care plans, and for delaying complaint responses. What happened Mrs Y was an elderly woman with several health conditions who lived at home with […]

Derbyshire County Council responsible for faults in care assessment and personal budget setting for a direct payment after a revision Read More »

Avery Homes (Nelson) Limited criticised for failures in medication management, cleanliness and person‑centred care for a blind resident 

Date of decision: 12 March 2026 SummaryA woman complained that Avery Homes (Nelson) Ltd, which runs Avalon Court Care Home, failed properly to administer her elderly blind mother’s prescribed medication, maintain hygiene standards, and provide care adapted to her visual impairment, and then gave inconsistent accounts when she challenged this.  What happenedIn early May 2025, the care provider, Avery Homes (Nelson) Ltd, carried

Avery Homes (Nelson) Limited criticised for failures in medication management, cleanliness and person‑centred care for a blind resident  Read More »

City of Doncaster Council at fault through care home failure to seek medical advice and keep proper records

Date of decision: 18 November 2025 SummaryStaff in a Doncaster Council commissioned care home failed to monitor symptoms, seek prompt medical advice, or record concerns from a daughter about the worry that her mother had a serious UTI, leaving the family with lasting uncertainty about whether earlier action could have prevented the woman’s hospitalisation and

City of Doncaster Council at fault through care home failure to seek medical advice and keep proper records Read More »

Hampshire excused for distinguishing between current and previous contractual arrangements with regard to uplifts, affecting top-ups

Date of decision: 23 March 2026 Summary A husband of a care home resident complained that the Council increased the rate it paid to his wife’s care home by only 2%, while other care homes with whom it was contracting received a 5% uplift. This created an unsustainable increase in the top-up fees he was

Hampshire excused for distinguishing between current and previous contractual arrangements with regard to uplifts, affecting top-ups Read More »

Danforth Care No. 1 Limited’s decision to pay a full refund for a week of respite due to care and complaint failings approved by the Ombudsman

Date of decision: 16 December 2025 Summary A woman who privately paid for a week’s respite at a care home experienced poor basic care, including problems with meals, bed‑making and room cleaning, and felt her concerns were not escalated, causing her such distress that she left three days early. She received only a partial refund

Danforth Care No. 1 Limited’s decision to pay a full refund for a week of respite due to care and complaint failings approved by the Ombudsman Read More »

Borough Care Ltd found responsible for care failures relating to effort in the face of refusal of support with personal care and hygiene

Date of decision: 12 December 2025 Summary Mr X complained that Borough Care Ltd failed to maintain proper personal hygiene for his elderly relative Y, who has dementia and lives in residential care.  The Care Provider took six months to investigate the family’s concerns about unpleasant odours and used incontinence pads left in Y’s room.

Borough Care Ltd found responsible for care failures relating to effort in the face of refusal of support with personal care and hygiene Read More »

Care Concern Limited found at fault for ambiguous contract terms on Funded Nursing Care payments and failure to clarify funding position with the ICB 

Date of decision: 06 February 2026 Summary A daughter (Mrs Y)  complained that a care home run by the Care Provider charged her father (Mr X) the full residential fee without clearly explaining how NHS Funded Nursing Care (FNC) would be treated in his contract, leaving Mrs Y frustrated and confused about who was paying

Care Concern Limited found at fault for ambiguous contract terms on Funded Nursing Care payments and failure to clarify funding position with the ICB  Read More »

Avery Homes Kirkstall Limited found at fault in its approach to charging for funded nursing care

Date of decision: 03 December 2025 SummaryA man complained that a private care provider did not honour written terms in his father’s care home contract about refunding NHS Funded Nursing Care, once the NHS paid it. He said he chose the home on the understanding that if his father became eligible for Funded Nursing Care,

Avery Homes Kirkstall Limited found at fault in its approach to charging for funded nursing care Read More »

Essex County Council  criticised for letting a safeguarding enquiry into a provider’s  leaving a person unsupervised in a wheelchair, drift for months

Summary A man complained that the Council’s safeguarding enquiry into an incident where his adult disabled son was injured in respite care was slow, poorly communicated and did not properly reflect the family’s concerns. The protracted process left the family distressed and without confidence in respite care, meaning the parents lost their usual breaks from

Essex County Council  criticised for letting a safeguarding enquiry into a provider’s  leaving a person unsupervised in a wheelchair, drift for months Read More »

Hammersmith & Fulham found at fault for failing to address a care provider’s poor service and serious ‘quality of care’ concerns

Date of decision: 14 January 2026 SummaryA man receiving council‑commissioned supported living care experienced poor, inconsistent support that failed to follow his agreed routines, leading to distress, continence and behaviour problems, and avoidable reliance on family input. When the issue was raised repeatedly, the Council’s social worker did not respond robustly or quickly enough, and

Hammersmith & Fulham found at fault for failing to address a care provider’s poor service and serious ‘quality of care’ concerns Read More »