Intro to Ombudsman reports RE Direct Payments

Bath and North East Somerset Council partly upheld, part criticised regarding its approach to funding recreational activities via a personal budget

Date of decision: 26 May 2026 SummaryA relative complained that the Council stopped an autistic man’s direct payment funding for community activities after a review of his care and support plan, recording him as agreeing to changes and failing to give him or his family a copy of the revised plan, which caused avoidable confusion […]

Bath and North East Somerset Council partly upheld, part criticised regarding its approach to funding recreational activities via a personal budget Read More »

Sheffield City Council failed in its oversight and management of a disabled woman’s care plan and direct payments, and reclaim due process

Date of decision: 15 April 2026 SummaryA father complained that the Council mishandled his adult disabled daughter’s direct payments, allowing an increase to 2:1 support at one day centre to be funded from her account without proper agreement or care‑plan changes, and reclaiming a large “underspend” without checking planned use.  What happenedThe adult disabled woman,

Sheffield City Council failed in its oversight and management of a disabled woman’s care plan and direct payments, and reclaim due process Read More »

Staffordshire County Council criticised for fault in its approach to funding respite care through  Direct Payments

Date of decision: 07 May 2026 SummaryA mother informally supporting her son with learning disabilities complained that he had been without funded respite care since May 2025. This followed the Council’s refusal to allow flexible use of his direct payment to fund a more expensive respite option for fewer nights.  What happenedMr Y, an adult

Staffordshire County Council criticised for fault in its approach to funding respite care through  Direct Payments Read More »

Derbyshire County Council responsible for faults in care assessment and personal budget setting for a direct payment after a revision

Date of decision: 08 April 2026 Summary Derbyshire Council was at fault for delays and inconsistencies in assessing and re-assessing an elderly woman’s care needs, for producing inconsistent personal budgets and care plans, and for delaying complaint responses. What happened Mrs Y was an elderly woman with several health conditions who lived at home with

Derbyshire County Council responsible for faults in care assessment and personal budget setting for a direct payment after a revision Read More »

Reading Borough Council called out for failing for 6 months to commission support for engaging with the community that was part of the service user’s formal care plan, and for attempting to foist direct payments on the parent

Date of decision: 06 February 2026 Summary  An adult woman with autism and mental health issues and an assessed need for 18 hours per week of community-based support was left without that input for around six months, leaving her isolated at home and wholly reliant on her parents for care. The Council repeatedly pressed her

Reading Borough Council called out for failing for 6 months to commission support for engaging with the community that was part of the service user’s formal care plan, and for attempting to foist direct payments on the parent Read More »

Redcar & Cleveland Council set a fixed upper limit for its direct payment hourly rate, regardless of the evidence that it was insufficient

Date of decision: 11 December 2025 Summary A disabled man and his wife complained the Council rigidly managed their direct payments, delayed care plans and a carer’s assessment, and refused to let them use funds flexibly to employ suitable personal assistants at market rates. What happened In March 2023 the Council assessed the man’s needs

Redcar & Cleveland Council set a fixed upper limit for its direct payment hourly rate, regardless of the evidence that it was insufficient Read More »

Norfolk County Council failed to provide a streamlined transition to direct payments and provided a ‘woefully’ inadequate complaints response 

Date of decision: 01 April 2026 Summary A disabled adult lost her commissioned home care after her agency gave notice in July 2024 and the Council failed to provide timely replacement support or a properly managed transition to direct payments, leaving her without essential domestic and personal‑care hours for months and cutting her care plan

Norfolk County Council failed to provide a streamlined transition to direct payments and provided a ‘woefully’ inadequate complaints response  Read More »

Haringey LBC called out for terminating a direct payment when faced with a mentally unwell service user’s determined non-engagement regarding his cluttered home 

Date of decision: 30 October 2025 Summary A man said the Council wrongly suspended the direct payment that funded his essential day‑to‑day care, leaving him without the support he relied on and worsening his health, wellbeing and finances.  What happened In May 2023, the Council reviewed the man’s care needs after a period in which

Haringey LBC called out for terminating a direct payment when faced with a mentally unwell service user’s determined non-engagement regarding his cluttered home  Read More »

West Northamptonshire Council failed to communicate clearly or keep proper records about direct payments, regarding scope and flexibility of spend

Date of decision: 12 March 2026 Summary An individual complained that the Council changed what expenditure was allowed under a long‑standing direct payment for her disabled sister’s care, without proper discussion or clear written explanation, then refused items it had previously accepted and sought repayment of around £4,500.  What happened Miss W, an adult with

West Northamptonshire Council failed to communicate clearly or keep proper records about direct payments, regarding scope and flexibility of spend Read More »

Brighton & Hove Council exonerated for its stance regarding non-engagement and notional refusal of services – the Muriqi Kujtim principle in action

Date of decision: 10 December 2025 Summary A disabled woman with long‑term physical and mental health conditions complained that the Council stopped her direct payments, failed to arrange care and support at home, insisted on a deep clean of her unsafe property, and did not help her secure white goods or mortgage support. She said

Brighton & Hove Council exonerated for its stance regarding non-engagement and notional refusal of services – the Muriqi Kujtim principle in action Read More »