Leaving Care duties and rights for relevant children

Somerset Council failed to implement the correct statutory process to examine a complaint about an unsatisfactory transition from children’s to adults’ services

Decision date: 29 November 2024 Summary  The complaint was concerned with an unsatisfactory children’s to adults’ services transition in the context of mental illness, and a lack of multi-disciplinary working at the right time. But the main problem was the use of the wrong complaints process by the Council.  What happened In February 2024 Ms […]

Somerset Council failed to implement the correct statutory process to examine a complaint about an unsatisfactory transition from children’s to adults’ services Read More »

Portsmouth City Council at fault for the inappropriate way in which it dealt with a former relevant child

Decision date: 16/01/20 What happened Mr X is a ‘former relevant child’ who suffers from a variety of health conditions which have a serious effect on his ability to communicate in a respectful way. He was placed under the Council’s responsibility in 2010 under the Children Act, section 20 and agreed to the proposed academic

Portsmouth City Council at fault for the inappropriate way in which it dealt with a former relevant child Read More »

Who can sue a public authority under the Human Rights Act?

Claims of unlawful action, via judicial review proceedings, or reliance on Convention rights in other legal proceedings, are restricted to ‘victims’ – a concept from ECtHR law which has been directly imported into the UK Human Rights regime by section 7(7) and 7(3). In the view of the ECtHR, a victim is ‘any person, non-governmental

Who can sue a public authority under the Human Rights Act? Read More »

SA v A Local Authority [2010] EWHC 848 (Admin)

In this case the claimant (SA) successfully challenged the decision by the defendant local authority to provide support to her as a child in need under s17 of the Children Act 1989 rather than as a ‘looked after’ child. In December 2004, following an assessment by the local authority in which it concluded that her

SA v A Local Authority [2010] EWHC 848 (Admin) Read More »

R (on the application of M) v Hammersmith & Fulham London Borough Council [2006] EWCA Civ 917

The claimant (M) applied for judicial review of a decision of the defendant local authority to provide her with temporary accommodation under the Housing Act 1996 and the Homelessness (Priority Need for Accommodation) (England) Order 2002, and sought a declaration that she was a “former relevant child” under the Children Act 1989 s.23C and the

R (on the application of M) v Hammersmith & Fulham London Borough Council [2006] EWCA Civ 917 Read More »

R (on the application of G) v Southwark London Borough Council (2009) UKHL 26

This is an important ruling from the House of Lords setting out the relevant factors local authorities must consider when seeking to exercise their functions in relation to providing or assisting young people to find suitable accommodation. Changes to the Housing Act 1996 bought in by the Homelessness (Priority Need for Accommodation) (England) Order 2002

R (on the application of G) v Southwark London Borough Council (2009) UKHL 26 Read More »

London Borough of Hillingdon v Secretary of State for Education and Skills [2007] EWHC 514

A local authority has a duty to provide after-care services to any person who has been ‘looked after’ subject to the provisions of the Children (Leaving Care) Act 2000.  It is obliged to provide these services until the child attains the age of 21 or beyond if in full-time education.   Since R (Behre) v Hillingdon

London Borough of Hillingdon v Secretary of State for Education and Skills [2007] EWHC 514 Read More »