Not at Fault LGO

Wiltshire Council was not at fault for delaying a vulnerable adult’s move, until a finance deputyship was in place

Date of decision: 31 August 2025 SummaryA daughter complained that Wiltshire Council delayed moving her mother from a care home after she was assessed as not needing residential care, causing extra care costs because of the difference in the financial assessment rules.  What HappenedIn October 2023, Ms X was admitted to hospital after hallucinations linked […]

Wiltshire Council was not at fault for delaying a vulnerable adult’s move, until a finance deputyship was in place Read More »

West Northants exonerated with regard to the council’s preference for supported living over a care home provider, albeit on grounds that are dubious in law…

Date of decision: 20 April 2026 SummaryThe complaint challenged the Council’s timeliness, involvement, consideration of a preferred provider and complaint handling after an urgent review request about an adult daughter’s long‑term care; the Ombudsman found no fault, concluding the Council completed assessment and care planning within acceptable times, involved Ms Y and her mother throughout

West Northants exonerated with regard to the council’s preference for supported living over a care home provider, albeit on grounds that are dubious in law… Read More »

Essex County Council’s approach to a person’s financial capacity and informal management by a relative is ultimately upheld, despite some puzzling features of the report

Date of decision:28 July 2025 SummaryThis was a complaint about how the Council managed temporary care home charges, financial access, advocacy arrangements, and the move toward deputyship for an elderly woman in its care.  What happenedIn June 2023, the Council arranged for an elderly woman to move into temporary residential care due to limited space

Essex County Council’s approach to a person’s financial capacity and informal management by a relative is ultimately upheld, despite some puzzling features of the report Read More »

Birmingham City Council upheld in refusing to facilitate contact between a parent and an adult disabled person, now living in supported accommodation after ceasing to be fostered

Date of decision: 23 February 2026 SummaryA mother complained that Birmingham Council delayed and then wrongly refused her request to have contact with her adult child, who had long been in care and now lives in supported accommodation.  What happenedThe complainant, Ms X, has an adult child, Y, who was placed in long‑term foster care

Birmingham City Council upheld in refusing to facilitate contact between a parent and an adult disabled person, now living in supported accommodation after ceasing to be fostered Read More »

Surrey County Council exonerated  regarding decision-making concerning a move into a care home it saw as the person’s or the attorney’s own choice

Date of decision: 05  November 2025 SummaryA woman’s power of attorney strongly asserted that the Council’s home‑care plan was inadequate and that the woman potentially needed permanent residential care. The Ombudsman found the Council had properly assessed her needs, arranged a substantial home‑care package and reasonably decided she did not require Council‑funded permanent care home

Surrey County Council exonerated  regarding decision-making concerning a move into a care home it saw as the person’s or the attorney’s own choice Read More »

Newcastle City Council praised for its attention to the law on taking resources into account, in a scenario where the cost of supporting the carer to keep going would likely have resulted in an offer of a care home placement ONLY

Date of decision: 15 December 2025 SummaryA woman with dementia received a substantial home care package funded by the Council alongside extensive informal care from her daughter, who was also a paid personal assistant via direct payments for some of the input. The daughter complained that the Council should fund 24‑hour live‑in care at home,

Newcastle City Council praised for its attention to the law on taking resources into account, in a scenario where the cost of supporting the carer to keep going would likely have resulted in an offer of a care home placement ONLY Read More »

Hammersmith & Fulham LBC not at fault in provision of s117 aftercare in a case beset by severe degrees of refusal to engage

Date of decision: 18  December 2025 SummaryA mother complained that the Council, NHS Trust and Integrated Care Board failed to provide appropriate mental health and social care support to her vulnerable adult daughter and did not adequately safeguard her from abuse, leaving the daughter exposed to risks and the mother burdened with excessive caring responsibilities

Hammersmith & Fulham LBC not at fault in provision of s117 aftercare in a case beset by severe degrees of refusal to engage Read More »

Lincolnshire County Council and ICB partner found not at fault in how they had tried to discharge joint s117 duties towards a woman who found the assessment form intolerably difficult

Date of decision: 08 December 2025 SummaryAn autistic woman who receives free aftercare under s117 of the Mental Health Act complained that the Council and NHS bodies had failed for years to give her appropriate care and to adapt their assessments to her communication needs. She said the lack of suitable autism‑specific support and refusal

Lincolnshire County Council and ICB partner found not at fault in how they had tried to discharge joint s117 duties towards a woman who found the assessment form intolerably difficult Read More »

Tower Hamlets’ finding of non-eligibility upheld in a scenario where a disabled person was also a carer with some respite hours for support to the cared-for person

Date of decision: 07 October 2025 Summary An individual complained after the Council refused a home care package, claiming it relied on inaccurate occupational therapy assessments and misread her medical evidence. She said this left her unsupported, causing distress and health impacts.  What happened The complainant, born with a complex heart condition leading to fatigue

Tower Hamlets’ finding of non-eligibility upheld in a scenario where a disabled person was also a carer with some respite hours for support to the cared-for person Read More »

Staffordshire County Council’s decision on classifying a care home placement as permanent, and charging accordingly, is found to be legitimate

Date of decision: 05 January 2026 Summary A daughter complained that Staffordshire Council wrongly classified her late father’s care home placement as ‘permanent’ instead of temporary, and gave misleading advice on a deferred payment agreement for his fees.  What happened Mr Y went into hospital and was discharged home with a care package in July

Staffordshire County Council’s decision on classifying a care home placement as permanent, and charging accordingly, is found to be legitimate Read More »